Posts Tagged ‘Craven Matt’

Life of David Gale, The

Selasa, Maret 23rd, 2010

Life of David Gale, The
Life of David Gale, The (2003)

IMDB rating: 7.20

Plot: Dr. David Gale, an advocate of eliminating the death penalty, is falsely accused of rape and murder. Once convicted, he ends up on death row in Texas himself, telling his story to a reporter through a series of flashbacks.

buy online Life of David Gale, The and download

Directors: Parker Alan

Actors: Spacey Kevin,Ritchey Lee,Mann Gabriel,Craven Matt,Beaver Jim,Rippy Leon,De Luna Jesse,Grote Vernon,Crime,Drama,Thriller,

Movie Poll: Cate Blanchett vs. Kate Winslet: Who is better actress, and more beautiful?
i enjoy both..cant decide..

i just saw Curious Case of Benjamin and Cate is just stunning and great actress..also from Lord of the Rings, Indiana Jones 4, etc..

but Kate Winslet is always been great since Sense and Sensibility and Titanic.and Life of David Gale..Finding Neverland..

so who wins this?


Cate Blanchett looks amazing for her age and is an awesome actress, but i think Kate Winslet’s performance in Titanic was unbeatable. Plus she has beautiful hair and eyes. So, Kate Winslet.

Sugar we're going down <3 | Feb 02, 2009


Cate is a better actress, Kate is more beautiful, in my opinion.
Natalie P | Feb 02, 2009


I love Cate Blanchett. She’s absolutely amazing.
Love's Password | Feb 02, 2009


Kate
Loser | Feb 02, 2009


You can’t compare those two women just because they have the same name.
Captain Oats 27 | Feb 02, 2009


kate winslet
123456 | Feb 02, 2009


i reckon they’re probably both equal, they are both beautiful and both vey talented
90's kid | Feb 02, 2009


I like them both. If you’re a Kate Winslet fan, you should check out The Reader. It’s pretty great, if you don’t mind sitting through the first forty-five minutes, which is pretty much just a soft porn.
Dylan | Feb 02, 2009


Kate Winslet.
~StillNight~ | Feb 02, 2009


Kate Winslet…
cowok insyaf | Feb 02, 2009

Crimson Tide

Minggu, Desember 27th, 2009

Crimson Tide
Crimson Tide (1995)

IMDB rating: 7.10

Plot: In the near future, Russian rebels have taken over one of the ICBM bases in the USSR. Alarmed by the prospect of a rebel strike, the U.S. sends the U.S.S. Alabama, a nuclear ballistic submarine, to watch over the base and retaliate in case they launch. While on patrol, the submarine is attacked and the radio systems are knocked out. An emergency message received during the battle is only partially recovered. Captain Ramsey believes it to be the order to launch on the rebels, while XO Hunter wants to wait for a confirmation message. The conflict escalates into mutiny as Ramsey and Hunter fight for control of the Alabama’s nuclear missiles.

Directors: Scott Tony

Actors: Washington Denzel,Hackman Gene,Craven Matt,Dzundza George,Mortensen Viggo,Gandolfini James,Carroll Rocky,Gomez Jaime,Milhoan Michael,Burkholder Scott,Nucci Danny,Brancato Lillo,Bruskotter Eric,Rick Schroder,Zahn Steve,Action,Drama,Thriller,

Do you agree, even if the FLORIDA GATORS lose to ALABAMA, they will still be number one ?
Yes that is what I said. The SEC is still the hottest and most dominating conference in college
football today. And it has been that way for the past 5 years actually. But anyway.
The Florida Gators are still the best team in the league. So let me ask you this one. If Alabama
beats them on December the 5th, will it even matter ? The Tide is ok, but even they may not
get the job done. We know how this story goes. Oklahoma and LSU were picked to beat them,
but that did not happen. (By the way, I am in South Carolina) And yes, the Gamecocks gave them a
run for the money this past weekend. So then again, I may be wrong about the Crimson Tide.
This year has been their toughest one yet. So can the Florida Gators, and Tebow still get the job
done ? AND if they lose, will they still be the best team in the country……………..
Adrian please. You got Tennesse and
Georgia, and Auburn too. Those
teams have struggled this year. But
even with they way that they are now,
they can beat 95 percent of the teams
in college football today. And that
is a fact ! Dont forget about the Pac
10 and their 0-8 record vs the
SEC.


With college polling, who knows what might happen.

No Adrian, the joke of the century was USC being ranked ahead of LSU when both teams had one loss. USC had lost to Washington while LSU had beat Washington. There was no way to justify USC being ranked ahead of LSU. And Oregon proved that.

Besides LSU the SEC has several teams that no one wants to play. Including: Ole Miss, Arkansas and Tennessee.

Moon Watermelon | Nov 16, 2009


No, but they won’t lose, so don’t worry!
timefan | Nov 16, 2009


Nope
T A | Nov 16, 2009


Dude, this question borders on the incredible. So, you are saying that a 12-1 Florida team would STILL be better than a 13-0 Tide team that just beat them? Dude, what are you smoking and can I have some?

Florida will get Rolled by the Tide Dec. 5th. Bet dat!
Bam Bam | Nov 16, 2009


If they lose they will fall below all the undefeated teams.Don’t agree!
~

Paulie - DivX Version (Normal Quality), iPod/iPhone Version

Kamis, Nopember 19th, 2009

PauliePaulie (1998)

IMDB rating: 6.10

Plot: Paulie, an intelligent parrot who actually talks, relates the story of his struggle to a Russian immigrant who works as a janitor at the research institute where he is housed and neglected. Paulies story begins many years earlier when he is given as a gift to a little girl who stutters. Eventually, he teaches the girl to speak correctly but is taken away by her father because he believes the girl cannot distinguish fantasy from reality because she believes the bird can talk. Paulie goes through a series of adventures with a pawn shop owner, an ageing widow, a Mexican-American troubadour and a would be thief before being taken to the institute where he now lives.

Download

Available versions:

DivX Version (Normal Quality), iPod/iPhone Version

Directors: Roberts John

Actors: Shalhoub Tony,Marin Cheech,Davison Bruce,Mohr Jay,Mohr Jay,Hackett Buddy,Craven Matt,Cobbs Bill,Basch Peter,Adventure,Comedy,Drama,Family,

Download Full Version>>

Why do people hate hardcore matches?No Blood?!Vince Kills everything.Wrestling has gone downhill?
i mean alot of ppl on here or youtube say tna/ecw/wcw sux if talking about hardcore…some of them say that hardcore is dead….oh please….whats the point of wreslting without hardcore…its the most entertaining…id love seeing paulie come in and tell everyone that TNA IS GOING EXTREME!!!!!…lol….the extreme era would kick some *ss!!!…since wrestling is fake…why settle for old school wreslting….anyone ever heard of changes?,,,lol….but wwe is like wrestling in the 80’s and 70’s…boring slow paced pg boringness…..tna is a mix like wcw was…and ecw was mostly hardcore(thats right…ecw vince brought back is crap!! and not ecw at all)…he brought it back just to kill it..he killed the tag division..he even killed wwf…sigh..ppl say that matches dont need blood to be entertaining..umm..how is that realistic?..ppl getting "punched" 50 times during a match and never coming out bloodied up?!..i can deal with standard matches having no blood..but HELL IN A CELL??!!…oh come on!!….wrestling fans are about the most loyal of all fans it seems….and this is how vince treats us?..i used to worship wwf lol…i was the biggest nerd about it…i never missed a raw…only missed very little smackdowns…and now i get this…the pg era….it just shows u that vince could care less about wwe fans…now everyone who is like me.. has to watch tna only or roh…..all the money vince has yet look at the roster…..LOOK!!….dead tag,divas,hardcore divisions..lol…even the main event is the same ppl over and over and over again…why?a multi billion dollar company and thats all we see?…lol tna is no where close to vinces level and they have so much fresh talent…orton,cena,dx,legacy…thats 3 years of main events…those guys i just mentioned..and smackdown may have some fresher talent….but the story is terrible and most matches end in DQ anyways…ecw is the best but too boring to watch still

wjhat do u guys think about wreslting these days?
like 2003-2009
.i could write a whole book on my thoughts as much as i write here in the wrestling section ..geez….too much…oh well.lol
well ppl know what they are getting into and rvd didnt have any regrets…they actually prefer the hardcore style…the way wwe is going….we need pauliecw more than ever


I agree with you totally.All Mcmahon cares about is how many kids buy WWE merchandise. I miss hardcore and cruisewieght action.Those are the things that made me love wrestling.

RedHotVixen26 | Nov 09, 2009


i watch wwe and tna and definetly prefer tna, but as for hardcore matches,i like them if there is a story to it. Like random hardcore matches like abyss foley at bfg was a little pointless. But if we r talking old school ecw like raven v dreamer and having hardcore offcourse thats entertaining but thats because of the rivalry. WWE’s pg is stupid but from a business point of view its better for wwe to be pg as much as we hate it. And yes no blood in hell in a cell or tlc matches are just plain stupid. But an all out hardcore show just wouldnt work. You need out and out wrestling as well which is why i like TNA’s combination of hardcore with just wrestling (and far better wrestling than wwe could put on).
Evenflow DDT - The Raven Effect | Nov 09, 2009


I am not so sure you understand that even though it is fake, in the hardcore you are talking about, people get hurt. In hardcore the body goes through a lot of abuse and I am not sure anyone signed on for that. Wrestlers do a lot of training so they can do what they do. Part of the training ivolves making sure the moves are done so no one really gets hurt. Hardcore, such as the old ECW was where wreslters actually went out and withstood the pain for the fans. Many of the wrestlers that did this did it because they could not get hired by the companies that would actually give them decent pay. Knowing that the blood would bring the blood thirsty, they sacrificed a hellofa lot for the fans. Hardcore has gone down the tubes because of what it took for those guys to do that … pain killers, drugs, steroids…. drugs period. And with all the problems lately, that has changed. There are now actual limits that the law will allow. Fake: It is billed entertainment. When they start sacrificing their bodies…such as one time Mick Foley actually had his ears ripped off and sewn back on… that was not fake; it happened… and when people start to get hurt nd need pin killers to put one foot in front of the other, there has to be a limit on what hey will do for those who are blood thirsty. Those who want to see this and think the "new wrestling" is too old school should climb in the ring sometime with one of these guys and see how long you can last and how "ridiculously silly" it really is. I understand what you are saying about…if it is fgake…why settle for… but the point you miss is that extreme nd hardcore are not fake…those guys are really sacrificing their bodies. The winner and loser part may be fake but the pain and blood and guts you see there is largely real. That is why they call it extreme. And unfortunately this has led to the backyard crap where people think it is ok to do this and kids are getting maimed and killed. So would you rather be entertained with the old school, or listen to the news and hear how another wrestler slaughtered his family while those who were yelling for blood condemn him. Or another wrestler who was once involved in hardcore was found dead in his motel room cause his heart finally gave out from all the past abuse and now his wife has to get on there and act ridiculous because the man who borught home the bacon is dead. Hope I am giving you something to think about. Not condemning your viewpoint, just letting you know…in hardcore … the injuries are real and that is what led ti a lot of steroid and drug abuse and would have eventually shut wrestling down altogether.
Dave | Nov 09, 2009


Oh Man. Dave is right. Fake. Right. Try a few torn muscles, busted knees and surgeries and then watching people die from all the abuse of the past and they still put themselves through and there’s your answer. Not approving or condemning. Wrestlers know what the fans want and they usually know too late after they are already in. Most really belive the fans care for them in some strange way until they see its blood and guts they want and it don’t matter whose.
But no matter. To answer your question with regard to the WWE I doubt you will see a lot of Hardcore or Extreme anything there with Linda McMahon running for the senate. Dodd would love to see a few hardcore matches and then have her for lunch over it. So, if you want Hardcore there, it ain’t gonna happen till this senate crap is over.
The Hunter | Nov 09, 2009


Just watch TNA or ROH to get your fix. WWE is for kids; save for the hickup of the Attitude era, it always has been.
John | Nov 09, 2009