Ideal Husband, an

Stargate: The Ark of Truth (2008) IMDB rating: 7.10 Plot: SG-1 searches for an ancient weapon which could help them defeat the Ori, and discover it may be in the Ori’s own home galaxy. As the Ori prepare to send ships through to the Milky Way to attack Earth, SG-1 travels to the Ori galaxy aboard the Odyssey. The International Oversight committee has their own plans and SG-1 finds themselves in a distant galaxy fighting two powerful enemies.

here i find movie Stargate: The Ark of Truth cheap

Actors: Browder Ben,Judge Christopher,Shanks Michael,Bridges Beau,Graham Currie,Guinee Tim,Sands Julian,Beach Michael,Jones Gary,Christopher Martin,Adventure,Fantasy,Sci-Fi,

Which came first? Stargate Continuum or Stargate: The Ark of Truth?
In terms of Stargate cannon, which movie came first? I watched them both after watching the entire SG1 series but I’m not sure in what order the movies "should" go in.

---

I’m pretty sure that The Ark of Truth came before Continuum because The Ark of Truth finishes the story of the last season

Amy S | Sep 13, 2009

---

ark of truth, then continuum
a | Sep 13, 2009

Moby Dick (1998) IMDB rating: 6.50 Plot: Herman Melville’s classic 1851 sea tale about the vengeful sea Captain Ahab who seeks to kill the great white whale who took his leg and is willing to forego the safety and endurance of his crew to do it. The tale is told from the vantage of the only surviving member, Ishmael, a young man who joins the crew of the Pequod for his first seafaring with the aid of his harpoonist friend, Queequeeg.

Download Moby Dick

Actors: Thomas Henry,Spence Bruce,Keays-Byrne Hugh,Cuming Robin,Connor Shane,Stewart Patrick,Waretini Piripi,Purcell Dominic,Yemm Norman,Jackson Michael,Owens Warren,Golden II Norman D.,Hopkins Harold,Lee John,Adventure,Drama,

I have some questions about the book "Moby Dick" by Herman Melville?
Please help with any questions you can

1. What do Starbuck and Captain Ahab have in common?
2.Why is captain Ahab obsessed with killing Moby Dick?
3.Who is the first to spot Moby Dick?
4.Who is the first man to die?
5.How do Fedallah’s prophesies come to pass?
6. who is the only surviver?
7. how did he survive?

---

go on sparknotes
Hello | Feb 03, 2010

Transformers (2007) IMDB rating: 7.50 Plot: A long time ago, far away on the planet of Cybertron, a war was being waged between the noble Autobots (led by the wise Optimus Prime) and the devious Decepticons (commanded by the dreaded Megatron) for control over the Allspark, a mystical talisman that would grant unlimited power to whoever possessed it. The Autobots managed to smuggle the Allspark off the planet, but Megatron blasted off in search of it. He eventually tracked it to the planet of Earth (circa 1850), but his reckless desire for power sent him right into the Arctic Ocean, and the sheer cold forced him into a paralyzed state. His body was later found by Captain Archibald Witwicky, and before going into a comatose state Megatron used the last of his energy to engrave a map, showing the location of the Allspark, into the Captain’s glasses, and send a transmission to Cybertron. He is then carted away by the Captain’s ship. A century later, Sam Witwicky, nicknamed Spike by his friends, buys his first car. To his shock, he discovers it to be Bumblebee, an Autobot in disguise who is to protect Spike, as he bears the Captain’s glasses and the map carved on them. But Bumblebee is not the only Transformer to have arrived on Earth - in the desert of Qatar, the Decepticons Blackout and Scorponok attack a U.S. military base, causing the Pentagon to send their special Sector Seven agents to capture all “specimens of this alien race,” and Spike and his girlfriend Mikaela find themselves in the middle of a grand battle between the Autobots and the Decepticons, stretching from Hoover Dam all the way to Los Angeles. Meanwhile, within the depths of Hoover Dam, the cryogenically stored form of Megatron awakens…

find and download Transformers in Full HD:1080p quaity

Actors: LaBeouf Shia,Duhamel Josh,Gibson Tyrese,Voight Jon,Anderson Anthony,Turturro John,O’Neill Michael,Cullen Peter,Bodin Charlie,Caldwell Andrew,Cox Bryan,David Keith,Doss Frederic,Action,Adventure,Sci-Fi,Thriller,

Why have Twilight 1+2 have not been nominated 4 Best picture+how come the actors?
And how come actors Kristen Stewart, Taylor Lautner or Robert Pattinson haven’t been nominated 4 best actors or supporting actors. The produces spent $87 million on the movies, the movie grossed $1,089,275,896, and the 3 actors, especially Taylor and Robert began receive a lot of attention from Hollywood. What more do the oscar people want? F***ing animated Up, and Inglorious bastards, a mockery of World War II gets chosen over Twilight. I’m pissed that film like these and Transformers, Harry Potter and Star Trek goes unnoticed by the oscar people.

---

Because Twilight is shit.
I Hate Yahoo | Feb 05, 2010

---

…. why isn’t Twilight nominated? Because the only people who enjoy it are little teen girls.

Up was a great hearty movie, and Inglorious Bastards was hilarious. Obviously they would be chosen over Twilight.
Graffiti Is Art, Not A Crime | Feb 05, 2010

---

Same reason Jackass the Movie Parts 1 & 2, Epic Movie, Disaster Movie, Meet the Spartans, etc. didn’t get nominated.

Twilight is of the same ‘quality’ (if you could call it that) of those movies.
brian2412 | Feb 05, 2010

---

I know you would like to imagine that the movies deserve a reward, but in all honesty, they are very terribly filmed movies. Anyone that had no idea what twilight was about would probably not have enjoyed waitching the movies for the first time.
Julian | Feb 05, 2010

---

the base awards on quality and talent. twilight lacks both.
Hidden Track | Feb 05, 2010

---

Sweetie, I hate to tell you this, but the majority of people hate those movies. I am one of the majority. The world is not full of pre-teens with raging hormones. Up and Inglorious Basterds were both good films with great acting and an impressive and unique storyline…They don’t choose films based off of the amount of money grossed…

These are some previous Best Picture winners…

Schindler’s List(1993)
The Deer Hunter(1978)
The Departed(2006)
Crash(2005)

Previous Nominees…
There Will Be Blood(2007)
Milk(2008)
The Pianist(2002)
The Shawshank Redemption(1994)

…do you really think Twilight deserves the same recognition as those movies?
CAUTION: MAY CAUSE HICCUPS! | Feb 05, 2010

---

probably because there are many twilight fans and it would be a pitiful battle against others also the movies sucked a55…im not a twilight fan
unfortunately half my class is
watch all the twilight fans give me a thumbs down XD
girl | Feb 05, 2010

---

nothing to do wiht twilight has been nominated kind for any kind of award bcuz twilight f***ing sucks.
they shouldnt be nominated for any kind of awards.
Sarah <3 | Feb 05, 2010

---

Because they sucked. The oscars don’t grant trophies for high grossing movies supported by teeny boppers. They grant oscars for good acting and those two yahoos in that movie are far from great actors. Teen movies and action movies with cut & paste plots don’t get oscars. They never have and never will. Sorry.
Harry Ball | Feb 05, 2010

---

Because it only appeals to immature teenage girls. Why WOULD it be nominated for those things? Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson are only mediocre. Taylor Lautner could do mcuh better if given the opportunity to be in a good movie.

Again, those actors don’t receive a lot of attention in Hollywood, they receive a lot of attention in junior high locker rooms.

Even the people I know that enjoyed the books say the movies sucked.
Bert | Feb 05, 2010

---

The reason is cuz oscars are not for WORST movie of the year.

Now maybe some doctors might think the Twilight movies are good…cuz it works almost as good as anesthesia, and without drugs.

Also, it’s really hard to nominate a movie for something if u slept thru it.
Destroyer of Dumbasses | Feb 05, 2010

---

Twilight has to be one of the worst books ever written, and the movie backs this up. I lost respect for the actors that said yes to playing a role in the movie, surely they would have read the script before saying yes. The day Twilight gets nominated for best anything, I’ll ride a horse naked through the streets of Paris.
Becky | Feb 05, 2010

---

twilight is a great movie, (the books are better) but they decided to go with summit entertainment for some odd reason, and summit sucks at special animation, graphics, and pretend images, which is alot of what twilight is, though the content is wonderful in the books, they condense the movie too much for lazy people, and the make up doesn’t even cover the vampires faces all the time…
rosie | Feb 05, 2010

---

Well they may get a Razzie nod for the next movie so dont feel too blue. Also, Becky, you better get your birthday suit out because MTV rewards crap, so get your horse ready for the Movie Awards.
gataroo | Feb 05, 2010

---

Not trying to sound rude in any way; But you’re talking about the OSCARS. The Oscars is a very high class motion picture academy. At least more than half of the critiques there can give you millions of reason why it wasnt nominated. But for the kind of movie of what Twilight is, one reason is GOOD enough. I have nothing against Twilight at all, im just pointing the facts. You’re dealing with professional directors, producers, actors, critiques, and more. There some amazing people. But what the other person said is right. Twilight fits more in the MTV awards. for TEENS.
Joanne | Feb 05, 2010

---

Because Twilight only appeals to teenage girls and is also a bad movie, the book is also bad. Up and Inglorious Basterds are both very good movies and the academy awards are for good movies. As for the actors all three of the ones you mentioned cannot act, the only reason they do so well in the twilight movies is because the material sucks.
samkartozia | Feb 05, 2010

---

Probably because ( in my opinion ) vampire/werewolves in modern 21st century is not very interesting anymore. It didn’t get most of the attention all ages viewers. I think
Setsuna S | Feb 05, 2010

Man Who Would Be King, The (1975) IMDB rating: 8.00 Plot: ” The Man Who Would Be King” is about two ambitious ex-soldiers stationed in India who set out to become the rulers of an entire country. After finishing their tour of duty in India, Daniel Dravot and Peachy Carnehan have decided that India is “too small for the likes of them,” so they decide to bribe a local ruler and extort money from him, in order to buy twenty Martini rifles, which they will use to take over villages in Kafristan. They face many challenges and perils along the way, including difficult terrain, hostile natives, freezing temperatures, and an avalanche high in the mountains. They eventually come to a small village, Urheb, where they meet Ootah and Billy Fish, an Indian who speaks English; he then becomes their translator. They then train the natives of this village to use the rifles, and soon conquer village after village. During a battle, Daniel is struck by an arrow that seemingly sticks out of his chest. The ignorant natives believe that he must be a God for not having died, and fall down and begin worshiping him. Daniel and Peachy decide that it would be easier for a “God ” to take over the country, so they pretend that Daniel is a god, the son of Alexander the Great who has returned after 2200 years to again rule Kafristan. The entire country celebrated the return of their new ruler, the Son of Segunda (”Alexander”). As a token of their admiration, the holiest of holy men gives Daniel all of the gold and riches left by Alexander in 328 B.C. It is enough to make them the richest men in the world . . . All goes well until Daniel’s ego and greed gets the best of him. He asks Peachy to bow when he walks in front of him. He later tells Peachy that he has decided to stay, and now believes that he is the son of Alexander ( ‘in spirit, anyways”), and that to fulfill his destiny, he will marry Roxanne, like his “father” Alexander did before him. The Kafiri’s believe that a mortal cannot marry a God, but Daniel goes ahead anyway. Peachy was set to leave with his share of the treasure, but Daniel convinced him to stay ” for old time’s sake” for the wedding. At the ceremony, Roxanne, believing that she would soon die, bites Daniel, drawing blood. The entire crowd realizes that since Danny is bleeding, that he is a man, not a God, and that he has been deceiving them the entire time. Peachy grabs Daniel and they run off with their twenty soldiers, shooting at the crowd of monks who set out to kill them. They are eventually captured, and Daniel is forced to walk out on a rope bridge. The monks cut the ropes, and Daniel bravely falls to his death. Peachy is later crucified; when they come to see him the next day, he is still alive, and they say that it is a miracle that he lived and they cut him down. He eventually climbs down into the valley and retrieves Danny’s head, still wearing the crown. He brings it back to Rudyard Kipling, a writer for the Northern Star, as proof that Daniel accomplished his goal, and became the King of Kafristan. Themes developed in the story: 1. ambition 2. friendship 3. taking risks 4. perseverance (not giving up) 5. power 6. honor and dignity

Actors: Connery Sean,Caine Michael,Plummer Christopher,Jaffrey Saeed,Larbi Doghmi,May Jack,Bouih Karroom Ben,Shamsi Mohammad,Moses Albert,Antrim Paul,Acres Graham,Blue Dancers of Goulamine The,Singh Gurmuks,Singh Kimat,Action,Adventure,

DREAM ROSTER + NIGHTMARE ROSTER,,,,,,,,, Please tell yours + I'll list mine?
RULES: 10 man team,

1.LeBron James
2.Kobe Bryant
3.Shaquille O’Neal
4.Dwight Howard
5.Dwayne Wade
6.Zydrunas Ilgaukar
7.Kevin Garnett
8.Steve Nash
9.Drew Gooden
10.Tracy McGrady

Nightmare Roster
1.Nene (Nuggets)
2.Beno Udrih (Kings)
3.Ricky Davis (Clippers)
4.Ryan Anderson (Magic)
5.Dorell Wright (Heat)
6.Troy Murphy (Pacers)
7.Chris Wilcox (Pistons)
8.Danny Green (Cavaliers)
9.Janerro Pargo (Bulls)
10.Patrick O’Bryant (Raptors)

---

lol- both teams need some touch ups-

Dream Team
- Shaq would be a nightmare at the moment
- Tracy mcGrady is probably the most frustrating player in the league (highest paid yet frequently injured)
- Big Z. really??, I mean…… really???
- Drew Gooden ^- look above

Nightmare team
- Should have added Adam morrison and Kwame Brown
Blaze R | Feb 06, 2010

Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) IMDB rating: 8.70 Plot: The year is 1936. A professor who studies archeology named Inidana Jones is venturing in the jungles in South America searching for a golden statue. Unfortunately, he sets off a deadly trap doing so, miraculously, he escapes. Then, Jones hears from a museum curator named Marcus Brody about a biblical artifact called The Ark of the Covenant, which can hold the key to humanly existence. Jones has to venture to vast places such as Nepal and Egypt to find this artifact. However, he will have to fight his enemy Renee Belloq and a band of Nazis in order to reach it.

download Raiders of the Lost Ark

Actors: Ford Harrison,Freeman Paul,Lacey Ronald,Rhys-Davies John,Elliott Denholm,Molina Alfred,Kahler Wolf,Higgins Anthony,Tablian Vic,Fellows Don,Hootkins William,Reimbold Bill,Sorenson Fred,Durkin Patrick,Action,Adventure,

'Indiana Jones: Raiders of the lost Ark' help?
So at the moment where doing ‘Indiana Jones: Raiders of the lost Ark’ for english and i have a few questions im stuck on… The question is
Other Characters: Many other characters play an important part in aiding both the hero and the villain, who are they and how do they contribute to the story? Is there anything special about there characters(foexamplele, are the female characterportrayeded as helpless an in need of rescue, or are they strong and independent characters that help the herachieveiv his goals?)
I can only think of marion Indiana’s love here is what i wrote for the question about her:
Marion

Rescuers, The (1977) IMDB rating: 6.80 Plot: A bottle containing a plea for help arrives at the Rescue Aid Society, an organization of mice from all over the world who’s mission is to help those in need. Bernard and Miss Bianca are chosen for the task and after gathering the needed clues and information, they fly on the back of albatross Orville to the gloomy and uncharted Devil’s Beyou. There, together with Ellie Mae and other swamp folk, they must work together to save a little orphan girl from the evil Madame Medusa.

find and download Rescuers, The in DivX quaity

Actors: Newhart Bob,Flynn Joe,Buttram Pat,Jordan Jim,McIntire John,Fox Bernard,Clemmons Larry,MacDonald James,Lindsey George,McMillian Bill,Taylor Dub,Animation,Adventure,Crime,Drama,Family,

Why is the price such an issue with dogs?
People want a "cheap" purebred dog or they balk at shelter adoption fees of $200 or $300. Why?
Do people just not realize that a dog is going to cost waaaay more than that in veterinary fees and food and possibly grooming?

Example, a girl I work with needs to find a home for her new dog (its a puppy about 14 weeks old now) - turns out she didn’t do her homework on the breed and its just too hyper in her home. She tells me she "just wants to find a good home for the dog" so I tell her to contact a shelter, agree to foster until a home can be found, and let the shelter administrate an adoption. Her response "oh no, I have to get at least my $250 back from whoever takes the dog. I also spent almost $100 more on dog stuff that I’ll let the people take, but I have to get some of my money back".
(I was at work so had to restrain myself big-time).

Also, because I have volunteered with rescues, I find myself constantly justifying the amount of the adoption fee to darn-near total strangers.

What is wrong with people?

While I am a rescuer at heart & never take issue with adoption fees, if I wanted to buy a purebred dog — I’d expect to pay a thousand or two to get a well-bred and healthy dog. I’d think a breeder were nuts (or more likely accuese them of being a BYB) if they weren’t charging those kind of prices.

Why - when it comes to dogs - are people so focused on the price tag?

---

This is question is dumb, simply because they don’t have 1 or 2k to shell out at that specific moment. Long term care of an animal is spread out into monthly payments and much more affordable, you’re looking at the picture wrong.

Why do people want cars or houses cheap , the maintanence is going to cost much more over time, that line of logic you use is nonsensical.
Dan V | Feb 05, 2010

---

+1

The rescue fees anger me more than anything. If they gave two tosses about the dog, they wouldn’t need to ask about the pricing!

People who balk at the initial price scare me. Someone I know wanted me to collect a puppy she’d saved up for the other day, and then wouldn’t understand why I wouldn’t do it when she said she couldn’t afford the bed etc until the following month!

It’s a massive commitment, which yes, unfortunately, means you’ll have to part with a little money, tough it up!!!

I’d like to see their faces when they buy a ‘cheap’ pup and then have to pay for all the initial jabs and boosters which haven’t been done and all the problems which may come with ones from clueless home-breeders and puppy farming.

And what about when it’s ill? There isn’t a puppy NHS ladies and gents.

P
PuppetStrings | Feb 05, 2010

---

The girl at your work should be talking to the breeder about returning/rehoming the dog. Should be right there in her contract.

I think you answered your own question though. People just don’t anticipate what caring for a dog will really cost. They get ‘puppy blindness’ and their brains fly right out the window. They also don’t understand how much a shelter, rescue, or reputable breeder has already put into the dog before they bring it home.

Our culture is so focused on everything being disposable that it’s little wonder so many people regard the dog as just one more purchase providing instant gratification.
Jessie | Feb 05, 2010

---

because it is the beed of the dog so that why some dogs are cheaper then other…………….
Brittany | Feb 05, 2010

---

I agree we paid 200.for our dalmatian well over the course of 13 yrs. we have spent well over 5grand on her vet bills,she had pymetra and almost died,not to mention food and christmas,birthday presents’ all of my babies are priceless..
mamanahe | Feb 05, 2010

---

Like I just answered in another question.
I do not define quality by price, it’s pretty foolish to think that just because the tag says $1000-$2000 you must be getting a good deal.

Also why do you care that she charges for the dog? It is hers & even though she was foolish in getting a dog that didn’t fit her lifestyle, doesn’t give you the right to determine how much she sells it for as long as she screens the calls & makes sure the dog is going to get a good home. I can’t stand when people GIVE away puppies/dogs for FREE, makes it easier for just anyone to take it, therefore resulting in it being dumped off, because it is worthless in the eyes of the owner.

At least this way the dog has a decent chance of finding someone who really wants it, even if she is just concerned with getting her money back.

Not everyone wants to "adopt" *&* not everyone wants an overpriced pet quality dog.

Star Trek: Nemesis (2002) IMDB rating: 6.40 Plot: On their way to Riker’s and Troi’s honeymoon, the Enterprise is sent near the neutral zone to Romulan space, and picks up a prototypic twin of android Data. Immediately they are further sent to Romulus, where a new praetor, Shinzon, a human cloned from Captain Picard who lives on the slave planet Remus, appears to want peace with the Federation. But then the crew detects a break-in on their computer systems, and Picard is captured by the Remans because Shinzon needs him as his only matching supplier of genetic material. Picard and the Enterprise can escape, only to find themselves battling Shinzon’s completely cloaked Warbird, who is after the complete destruction of earth.

Actors: Stewart Patrick,Frakes Jonathan,Spiner Brent,Burton LeVar,Dorn Michael,Hardy Linda,Perlman Ron,Ciccolella Jude,Dale Alan,Berg John,Owen Michael,Action,Adventure,Sci-Fi,Thriller,Drama,

Has the new Star Trek movie obliterated the Star Trek franchise?
SInce the success of the new film, new people have been wooed to the franchise - however, many are discovering that the franchise is nowhere as great as the new film.

In addition, the franchise as it was prior to the film is now "set in an alternate" universe - and is no longer relevant. Its gone.

Of course there will be some who will resent that notion - but I somehow cannot see Paramount splashing huge amounts of cash on that time-line anymore - the last time they did - it was called Nemesis.

New fans who like the film MAY have to wait for the sequel or a new series - and that could take years.

Has Paramount chucked out the baby with the bathwater?

Opinions please.

---

I would say that it is the other way around. The new film, in combination with the ill fated Enterprise series have actually done a lot of harm to the franchise. They haven’t made it irrelevant, they have tainted the name of Star Trek, and people who see them won’t bother to look at the older ones.

The original star trek and TNG, plus the original films had a massive cult following that sustained the Star Trek franchise for decades through conventions and merchandise, not to mention video games and DVD sales.

However, enterprise and the new film do NOT have this cult following. They are highly polished yet highly generic action/adventure properties that have failed to attract a sustainable audience, and which have actually turned off a lot of potential fans who have seen Enterprise and the new movie and instead of becoming interested in the originals have labeled them as being dumb action movies/series without even watching them. And thus have not become fans and have not gone on to support the franchise by buying merchandise or attending conventions.

This is a complete disaster. A new generation of fans has been lost before they were even found, and it will cost Start Trek in the long term by killing off potential sources of revenue. While the existing fan base ages and dwindles it is not being replaced because of these dumb movies/series.

Nemesis was a a mistake, In fact it was exactly the same mistake. Both the new film and Nemesis were action movies with a Star Trek theme, not actual Star Trek movies. They were aimed at action movie fans, not Star Trek fans. They took out most of the adventure and the science fiction and ended up making Die Hard in space. which frankly sucked.

There won’t be any new films using the old actors, not because the new film killed off the franchise, but because most of the original/TNG actors are old and wrinkly and only really suited for cameos, and because they don’t want to do a new film because they know that the studios will ruin it like they did with Nemesis.

Meilien | Jun 06, 2009

---

i don care
i love movies
supremeunitedstatesofindia | Jun 06, 2009

---

Yes. It may be a yoof oriented movie, but it’s not star trek
Avondrow | Jun 06, 2009

---

The sequel is slated for 2011. That’s reasonable, even though I’d like to see it next week;)

It’s true that I (not a trekkie) am not going to check out all the previous Star Trek films. I’ve seen a couple of them on TV, have watched some episodes of the series .. but it now feels dated. I’m totally digging the new crew and look forward to seeing more of them. Especially Spock, he’s always been my fave char and Quinto is perfect.

I don’t get your question. What Paramount wisely did is to lift the franchise out of its narrow niche. Look at the box office numbers of the previous Star Trek films! Not impressive at all. The new Star Trek is doing tremendously well. So what’s the problem?
FilmTVfan | Jun 06, 2009

---

they have made a bit of a pigs ear of it, plus all that alternate timeline stuff is a major headache. it was bad enough with the occasional mirror universe episodes on trek and back to the future 2
Darth Tidiot | Jun 06, 2009

---

The canon information up until the point at which the movie split off into the "alternate universe" still IS relevant. Just saying.

I’m a new fan. I’ll be waiting for the sequels. I’m sure there won’t be a new series with all the actors they used in the new film.

By the way, I may enjoy action films, but that does not make me a neanderthal. And if it turns out that the next film is reported to have little to no action, I’ll STILL show up to watch it. I’ll be happy to watch it.
ZER0 C00L

It’s a Mad Mad Mad Mad World (1963) IMDB rating: 7.40 Plot: After a long prison sentence Smiler Grogan is heading at high speed to a California park where he hid $350,000 from a job 15 years previously. He accidentally careers over a cliff in view of four cars whose occupants go down to help. The dying Grogan gives details of where the money is buried and when the witnesses fail to agree on sharing the cash, a crazy chase develops across the state.

Actors: Tracy Spencer,Berle Milton,Caesar Sid,Hackett Buddy,Rooney Mickey,Shawn Dick,Silvers Phil,Terry-Thomas,Winters Jonathan,Anderson Eddie ‘Rochester’,Backus Jim,Blue Ben,Action,Adventure,Comedy,Crime,

Help with my Dinosaur's Rage Structure deck?
Deck List

Monsters:

Babycerasaurus
Black Ptera
Black Stego
Black Tyranno
Dark Driceratops
Kabazauls
Gilasaurus x2
Hydrogeddon x2
Hyper Hammerhead x2
Mad Sword Beast
Miracle Jurassic Egg
Oxygeddon
Sabersaurus
Super Conductor Tyranno
Tyranno Infinity
Ultimate Tyranno

Spells:

Big Evolution Pill
Heavy Storm
Jurassic World
Lightning Vortex
Magical Mallet x2
Megamorph
Mesmeric Control
Mystical Space Typhoon
Riryoku
Sebek’s Blessing
Tail Swipe

Traps:

Hunting Instinct
Survival Instinct
Volcanic Eruption
Seismic Shockwave
Magical Arm Shield
Negate Attack
Goblin out of the Frying Pan
Malfunction
Fossil Excavation

I need help in adding good and removing useless cards for a better gaming experience. The deck works well for me.

---

go 2 YUGIOHMINT.COM if u want dino help ok?
Alex | Feb 06, 2010

Fifth Element, The (1997) IMDB rating: 7.20 Plot: Two hundred and fifty years in the future, life as we know it is threatened by the arrival of Evil. Only the fifth element (played by Milla Jovovich) can stop the Evil from extinguishing life, as it tries to do every five thousand years. She is helped by ex-soldier, current-cab-driver, Corben Dallas (played by Bruce Willis), who is, in turn, helped by Prince/Arsenio clone, Ruby Rhod. Unfortunately, Evil is being assisted by Mr. Zorg (Gary Oldman), who seeks to profit from the chaos that Evil will bring, and his alien mercenaries.

Actors: Willis Bruce,Holm Ian,Oldman Gary,Tucker Chris,Perry Luke,James Brion,Lister Jr. Tom ‘Tiny’,Evans Lee,Creed-Miles Charlie,Tricky,Neville John,Bluthal John,Kassovitz Mathieu,Fairbank Christopher,Sci-Fi,Action,Adventure,Thriller,

whos the girl in the movie……..?
Whos the girl that plays Layla in "The Fifth Element".
sorry guys. the name is Lelou. not layla.
lol
my bad.

---

Lelou?? was played by Milla Jovovich

nas88car 300 #48 = 4 | Jan 23, 2010

---

Milla Jovovich
dugan | Jan 23, 2010

---

Milla Jovovich
Book_lover | Jan 23, 2010

Abyss, The (1989) IMDB rating: 7.40 Plot: An American nuclear submarine is attacked (during the cold war) and crashes underwater. The navy asks the workers of a nearby underwater oil rig who are joined by a number of navy SEALS to locate and investigate the cause of the crash. As the crew embark on their mission, they encounter a number of difficulties and discover that they may not be alone. There is something else down there.

Actors: Harris Ed,Biehn Michael,Burmester Leo,Graff Todd,Bedford Lloyd John,Quinn J.C.,Brewer Jr. Captain Kidd,Klek George Robert,Murphy Christopher,Nelson Adam,Warlock Dick,Weeks Jimmie Ray,Campbell J. Kenneth,Action,Adventure,Sci-Fi,Thriller,Drama,

What Do You Think Of My Poem: Light and Dark of the Common Man?
The common man exists in dark and light
And is at odds with what he thinks he is
For he must shine in day or dwell in night.
He must choose between life and the abyss.
Light is glorious, golden and gallant,
For all good things occur within its shine.
But it is temporary, too soon spent
And all it leaves is a flash in your mind.
While darkness is and will forever be.
It lurks in shadows and behind closed eyes.
Darkness masks what we do not want to see
And is our only comfort as light dies.
Since man is man, dark is dark, light is light
We shall always dwell in eternal night.

---

Or, eternal light. It is our choice.

Good writing. I enjoyed reading this.
shirleyf | Feb 05, 2010

---

I like it
The Modern Day Poe | Feb 05, 2010

---

Wow…
I really liked this. It made me truly think about dark and light in itself. Care to show me more writing?? This is really good and maybe you could return the favor by reading mine.

This is one of the first things I wrote. I am only 14. So, I don’t expect any good opinions, but maybe some constructive criticism. Please and thank you.

A flower that blooms in the spring days is an excellent example of the evolving culture and mankind. We may not realize all of the small things that change, but soon it will blossom into an extravagant flower. Then, die off and start the cycle once more. People and things change over time. Do not rely on anything to happen right away because there is always a flower that emerges late. Yet, it seems to be the most beautiful of them all.
Barbara | Feb 05, 2010

---

that’s a very good poem
thank you for sharing it with us
Seaman | Feb 05, 2010

---

What I think is that even while your words dwell on darker things, you bring a spark of light you sparkle when you write. You are pretty dam n good.
lovechild | Feb 06, 2010